Dimarisn.

/ˈdɪmərɪs/

Etymology: See mood n.² 2.

Logic.

The mnemonic term designating the third mood of the fourth figure of syllogisms, in which the major premiss is a particular affirmative (i), the minor a universal affirmative (a), and the conclusion a particular affirmative (i). Formerly called drimatis, dimatis. The initial d indicates that the mood can be reduced to Darii by (m) transposition of the premisses, and (s) simple conversion of the conclusion.

ΘΚΠ

the mind > mental capacity > philosophy > logic > logical syllogism > [noun] > mood or mode > types of

Bocardo1509

Ferison1509

Camestres1551

Celarent1551

Darapti1551

Datisi1551

Disamis1551

Felapton1551

Ferio1551

Festino?1568

Baroko1581

Cesare1588

Barbara1589

dabitis1599

fapesmo1599

Frisesomorum1599

baralipton1653

Dimaris1827

modus ponendo ponens1838

modus tollens1838

Camenes1851

1827 R. Whately Elem. Logic ii. iii. §4.

1864 F. C. Bowen Treat. Logic vii. 200.

1891 J. Welton Man. Logic I. iv. iii. §137. 403 Dimaris, An example is ‘Some parallelograms are squares; all squares are regular figures; therefore, some regular figures are parallelograms’.

This entry has not yet been fully updated (first published 1896; most recently modified version published online March 2022).

单词	dimaris
释义	Dimarisn. /ˈdɪmərɪs/ Etymology: See mood n.² 2. Logic. The mnemonic term designating the third mood of the fourth figure of syllogisms, in which the major premiss is a particular affirmative (i), the minor a universal affirmative (a), and the conclusion a particular affirmative (i). Formerly called drimatis, dimatis. The initial d indicates that the mood can be reduced to Darii by (m) transposition of the premisses, and (s) simple conversion of the conclusion. ΘΚΠ the mind > mental capacity > philosophy > logic > logical syllogism > [noun] > mood or mode > types of Bocardo1509 Ferison1509 Camestres1551 Celarent1551 Darapti1551 Datisi1551 Disamis1551 Felapton1551 Ferio1551 Festino?1568 Baroko1581 Cesare1588 Barbara1589 dabitis1599 fapesmo1599 Frisesomorum1599 baralipton1653 Dimaris1827 modus ponendo ponens1838 modus tollens1838 Camenes1851 1827 R. Whately Elem. Logic ii. iii. §4. 1864 F. C. Bowen Treat. Logic vii. 200. 1891 J. Welton Man. Logic I. iv. iii. §137. 403 Dimaris, An example is ‘Some parallelograms are squares; all squares are regular figures; therefore, some regular figures are parallelograms’. This entry has not yet been fully updated (first published 1896; most recently modified version published online March 2022). < n.1827
随便看	θ173568 θ173569 θ17357 θ173570 θ173571 θ173572 θ173574 θ173575 θ173576 θ173577 θ173578 θ173579 θ17358 θ173580 θ173581 θ173582 θ173583 θ173584 θ173585 θ173586 θ173587 θ173588 θ173589 θ17359 θ173590