I present an argument which makes sense of this disanalogy, without recourse to normative claims or additional ontological commitments.
Smith Leonie 2018, 'The Curious Case of Ronald McDonald's Claim to Rights: An Ontological Account of Differencesin Group and Individual Person Rights', Journal of Social Ontologyhttp://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jso.2018.4.issue-1/jso-2016-0042/jso-2016-0042.xml?format=INT. Retrieved from DOAJ CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode)