英语词汇“limitative judgement”的英英意思、用法、释义、翻译、读音、例句、短语、词组-英语词典

limitative judgement n. [after German beschränkendes Urtheil (1781 in Kant, in the passage translated in quot. 1838; now beschränkendes Urteil)] Logic a third quality of judgement besides affirmative and negative, used by Kant to denote judgements of the type ‘Every A is a not-B’; (also) a judgement serving to limit or modify another.

ΚΠ

1838 F. Haywood tr. I. Kant Critick Pure Reason ii. 74 These infinite judgments..are in fact merely limitative [Ger. beschränkend].]

1877 E. Caird Crit. Acct. Philos. Kant ii. vi. 307 Nor need Logic regard the infinite or limitative judgment as distinct from the affirmative.

1902 Philos. Rev. 11 488 He attacked the limitative judgment, which as we shall see, is the proper place for seeking the implications that lie in the negative.

2009 G. B. Moynahan in W. Breckman & M. Jay Modernist Imagination 67 The form of logic and concept are not based on the Aristotelian notion of ‘abstraction’, but on a complex form of ‘limitative judgement’ in which each statement is based on a certain horizon of assumptions.

单词	limitative judgement
释义	> as lemmas limitative judgement limitative judgement n. [after German beschränkendes Urtheil (1781 in Kant, in the passage translated in quot. 1838; now beschränkendes Urteil)] Logic a third quality of judgement besides affirmative and negative, used by Kant to denote judgements of the type ‘Every A is a not-B’; (also) a judgement serving to limit or modify another. ΚΠ 1838 F. Haywood tr. I. Kant Critick Pure Reason ii. 74 These infinite judgments..are in fact merely limitative [Ger. beschränkend].] 1877 E. Caird Crit. Acct. Philos. Kant ii. vi. 307 Nor need Logic regard the infinite or limitative judgment as distinct from the affirmative. 1902 Philos. Rev. 11 488 He attacked the limitative judgment, which as we shall see, is the proper place for seeking the implications that lie in the negative. 2009 G. B. Moynahan in W. Breckman & M. Jay Modernist Imagination 67 The form of logic and concept are not based on the Aristotelian notion of ‘abstraction’, but on a complex form of ‘limitative judgement’ in which each statement is based on a certain horizon of assumptions. extracted from limitativeadj.n. < as lemmas
随便看	θ117984 θ117985 θ117986 θ117987 θ117988 θ117989 θ11799 θ1098 θ10980 θ109800 θ109801 θ109802 θ109803 θ109804 θ109805 θ109806 θ109807 θ109808 θ109809 θ10981 θ109810 θ109811 θ109812 θ109813 θ109814

> as lemmas