Goclenianadj.

Brit.

/ɡə(ʊ)ˈkliːnɪən/, U.S.

/ɡoʊˈkliniən/

Forms: 1800s Goclenien, 1800s– Goclenian.

Origin: From a proper name, combined with an English element. Etymons: proper name Goclenius , -an suffix.

Etymology: < the name of Rudolf Goclenius (1547–1628), German philosopher + -an suffix. Compare German goklenisch, goclenisch (1794 or earlier).

Logic. Now usually historical.

In the traditional logic of categorical propositions: designating a variety of sorites (sorites n. 1a) in which the conclusion is formed of the subject of the last proposition and the predicate of the first (see quot. 1906). Contrasted with Aristotelian sorites n. at Aristotelean adj. and n. Additions.

ΚΠ

1819 J. Richardson tr. I. Kant Logic 193 A syllogism consisting of several abridged syllogisms producing one conclusion, is named a sorites (or heap), which may be either progressive, or regressive (Goclenian) [Ger. regressiv].

1849 W. Thomson Outl. Laws of Thought (ed. 2) 283 In the Goclenian Sorites extension is made more prominent by starting with the premiss which has the two widest terms; in the common form intension predominates, as the narrower terms precede.

1906 J. N. Keynes Stud. & Exercises Formal Logic (ed. 4) 370 Aristotelian Sorites,—All A is B, All B is C, All C is D, All D is E, therefore, All A is E. Goclenian Sorites,—All D is E, All C is D, All B is C, All A is B, therefore, All A is E.

1994 T. Williamson Vagueness (1996) i. 33 The distinction between Aristotelian and Goclenian forms became the main item of information in many a textbook's chapter on ‘Sorites’.

This entry has been updated (OED Third Edition, December 2016; most recently modified version published online March 2022).

单词	goclenian
释义	Goclenianadj. Brit. /ɡə(ʊ)ˈkliːnɪən/, U.S. /ɡoʊˈkliniən/ Forms: 1800s Goclenien, 1800s– Goclenian. Origin: From a proper name, combined with an English element. Etymons: proper name Goclenius , -an suffix. Etymology: < the name of Rudolf Goclenius (1547–1628), German philosopher + -an suffix. Compare German goklenisch, goclenisch (1794 or earlier). Logic. Now usually historical. In the traditional logic of categorical propositions: designating a variety of sorites (sorites n. 1a) in which the conclusion is formed of the subject of the last proposition and the predicate of the first (see quot. 1906). Contrasted with Aristotelian sorites n. at Aristotelean adj. and n. Additions. ΚΠ 1819 J. Richardson tr. I. Kant Logic 193 A syllogism consisting of several abridged syllogisms producing one conclusion, is named a sorites (or heap), which may be either progressive, or regressive (Goclenian) [Ger. regressiv]. 1849 W. Thomson Outl. Laws of Thought (ed. 2) 283 In the Goclenian Sorites extension is made more prominent by starting with the premiss which has the two widest terms; in the common form intension predominates, as the narrower terms precede. 1906 J. N. Keynes Stud. & Exercises Formal Logic (ed. 4) 370 Aristotelian Sorites,—All A is B, All B is C, All C is D, All D is E, therefore, All A is E. Goclenian Sorites,—All D is E, All C is D, All B is C, All A is B, therefore, All A is E. 1994 T. Williamson Vagueness (1996) i. 33 The distinction between Aristotelian and Goclenian forms became the main item of information in many a textbook's chapter on ‘Sorites’. This entry has been updated (OED Third Edition, December 2016; most recently modified version published online March 2022). < adj.1819
随便看	in a particular condition in a passion in a pause in a pelter in a pelting chafe in a person'a thing's hip pocket in a person's arms in a person's aucht in a person's audience in a person's bad books in a person's beard in a person's book in a person's books in a person's danger in a person's faith in a person's favour in a person's fingers in a person's gift in a person's good books in a person's governance in a person's half in a person's hand in a person's hands in a person's heels in a person's hip pocket