Subject to those principles the court had a broad discretion.

He threshold applicable to rule 3.4(2) was much higher than would be the case were the court exercising a broad discretion under rule 14.1 (5).

And any reviewing court would give very broad discretion to the original decision that was made.

Parliament had conferred on the office of the adjudicator a broad discretion.

So could create up several courts with broad discretion in decision outside the legal framework.